Dr. Firdous Baba
We are just three days away from the fifth anniversary of the integration of Jammu and Kashmir with the rest of the country. This historic day set the path for an inclusive ‘Naya Kashmir,’ aimed at the overall development of the state.
From development to the demand for the restoration of statehood, the political landscape has undergone a tectonic shift. This is, in fact, a positive change, as the political class, irrespective of party affiliations, has abandoned the secessionist agenda in their rallies and activities.
This shift was evident in the Lok Sabha elections, where the issues revolved around development and the restoration of statehood—a genuine and legitimate demand of the people in Jammu and Kashmir.
Gauging the pulse of the people, this was echoed during Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s maiden visit to Kashmir on Yoga Day after being elected for a third term. He promised the restoration of statehood and the conduct of the legislative assembly in Srinagar, sending a message to people in both Jammu and Kashmir that the Modi government is considerate of public demands. To recall, Home Minister Amit Shah has also promised these issues on the floor of the House multiple times.
However, it is crucial that these demands are not reduced to mere political maneuvers aimed at scoring points rather than achieving substantive progress. A critical step toward realizing the true potential of this region lies in redefining its identity, which can be significantly enhanced by renaming the Union Territory (UT) simply as Kashmir.
I am well aware that this proposal may not sit well with many sections of society, including Jammu, which is a vital part of Kashmir. Historically, Jammu existed as a separate entity before being merged into the larger identity of Kashmir. By naming the entire region Kashmir, we acknowledge and honor this historical continuity.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
As an inclusive and democratic society, it is worth studying this proposal and its broader implications before dismissing it outright.
Kashmir doesn’t merely represent a geographic region but embodies an identity that extends beyond its borders. It includes Pakistan-occupied Kashmir and adjacent territories. When, and if, these regions are reintegrated, a unified identity under the name Kashmir would be more fitting.
The kingdom of Kashmir extended its influence to Punjab, Afghanistan, and parts of Central Asia during the reign of Lalit Aditya Muktapeda. This period of expansion highlights Kashmir's historical significance and its role as a major cultural and political center in the region. Even the formidable armies of Alexander the Great could not conquer this land.
The rich history should not be diluted by associating it with regions that do not share the same heritage. Recognizing the entire UT as Kashmir acknowledges its historical prominence and ensures that its legacy is preserved.
Linguists note that the Kashmiri language is among the oldest in the world. It underscores the ancient civilization that flourished in the Kashmir valley. Renaming the UT as Kashmir would celebrate this linguistic and cultural heritage, reconnecting the region with its roots and providing a sense of pride to its inhabitants.
Additionally, a singular identity could bring economic and social benefits. It could elevate the economic profile of the region through improved connectivity and communication.
The restoration of statehood presents an ample opportunity to redefine the identity of the region based on its historical and cultural significance. Like the landmark August 5 decision, this too could make the BJP-led government proud for restoring the dignity and identity of our region.