Srinagar, Nov 6 (KNS): Jammu and Kashmir People's Conference chairman Sajad Lone voiced strong support for resolutions demanding the restoration of Article 370 and statehood, condemning the 2019 constitutional changes.

Lone called for clearer, unambiguous language in future resolutions to reflect the will of the people.

In a long post on X lone said, We had always said that we will support anything which is even remotely related to restoration of Article 370, 35 A, restoration of statehood and unequivocal condemnation of the majoritarian onslaught against J and K, irrespective of who brings it on the floor of the house.

It said, "We supported PDP resolution which unfortunately was not put to vote. And today we supported a resolution put forward by NC. This is despite the fact that we had no prior notice that a resolution would be moved. Neither did we know till the last moment, the exact wording of the resolution."

The post further reads, "We had already given a notice and sought an adjournment under rule 56, praying that all business of the house be set aside and instead discussion  be initiated about the events of 5 August, 2019,  its fallout on the inhabitants of J&K and federal structure." But we didn’t press for allowing it when the resolution was circulated this morning.

In the context of 5 August 2019 this assembly is the most powerful and relevant institution.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp ChannelIt is the first elected assemblage of representatives from f J and K post 2019. The content in the form of passed resolutions  emanating from this Assembly in the context of 2019 represents the will of the people of J and K.  And what it expresses about 5 August 2019, is a moral and political acceptance or rejection. It has legal connotations too.

I welcome and support this resolution. But this is the start not the end.

I would humbly state that the resolution writer has been too economical in the wording of the resolution, which could make it prone to differing interpretations.

This resolution will have to be supplemented by explicit terminology. We should be unambiguous in our disdain and contempt for 5 August 2019. And we should clearly state that the will of the people of J and k as embodied in the state assembly has clearly expressed that J and K should be reverted to Pre 5 August, 2019 status. We need to remove the ambiguities.

We have also submitted ammendments to the Motion of Thanks on LG's address for explicit codemnation of August 5 constitutional changes. There are a series of amendments that we have proposed. These amendments I believe can help remove the ambiguities. Hope that the amendments are supported by the House. (KNS)